This piece has a very well developed story arch. It starts out with Mark only hearing anecdotes about the mysterious dog, then he meets her, which leads to his close bond with the creature, and the eventual tragedy.
Additionally, the Bezmozgis' use of imagery added tone to the accident scene. He kept repeating the word "red" over and over, giving a sense of blood everywhere, or at least it would seem that way to a young child. "I hadn’t expected it to be red, although I also hadn’t expected it to be not-red. Set against the gray asphalt and her white coat, Tapka’s blood was the red I envisioned when I closed my eyes and thought: red," (Bezmozgis). The repeated use of this adjective makes the injured dog's blood the uncontested center of the scene and adds emotion to the moment.
The story is tied up nicely at the end when the narrorator realizes that, despite the fact that the creature will survive, in Rita's mind he "killed Tapka and [he] will never be forgiven," (Bezmozgis). Admittedly, it is not the most uplifting end to the saga, however, it is clean and definite; it does not leave the reader with any unanswered questions about the fate of the characters.
The story is tied up nicely at the end when the narrorator realizes that, despite the fact that the creature will survive, in Rita's mind he "killed Tapka and [he] will never be forgiven," (Bezmozgis). Admittedly, it is not the most uplifting end to the saga, however, it is clean and definite; it does not leave the reader with any unanswered questions about the fate of the characters.
No comments:
Post a Comment